Impact of Probabilistic Modeling Alternatives on the Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Dual Wall–Frame Buildings towards Resilient Designs

Ivanna Martinez, Marco F. Gallegos, Gerardo Araya-Letelier () and Diego Lopez-Garcia ()
Additional contact information
Ivanna Martinez: Department of Structural & Geotechnical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
Marco F. Gallegos: Department of Structural & Geotechnical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
Gerardo Araya-Letelier: School of Civil Construction, Faculty of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
Diego Lopez-Garcia: Department of Structural & Geotechnical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-25

Abstract: Demands to advance toward more resilient and sustainable cities in terms of reducing casualties, economic losses, downtime, and environmental impacts derived from earthquake-induced damage are becoming more frequent. Indeed, accurate evaluations of the seismic performance of buildings via numerical simulations are crucial for the sustainable development of the built environment. Nevertheless, performance estimations could be influenced by alternative probabilistic methods that can be chosen throughout the procedure of building-specific risk assessment, specifically in the construction and validation of fragility functions. This study evaluates the numerical impacts of selecting different probabilistic models on seismic risk metrics for reinforced concrete dual wall–frame buildings. Specifically, alternative probabilistic models are implemented and evaluated for (i) the identification and elimination of unusual observations within the simulated data (i.e., outliers); (ii) the selection and implementation of different Probability Distribution Functions (PDFs) to estimate fragility functions at different limit states (LSs); and (iii) the application of goodness-of-fit tests and information criteria to assess the validity of proposed PDFs. According to the results, the risk measures showed large variability at the extreme building LS (collapse). On the other hand, for a lower LS (service level), the measures remain similar in all the cases despite the methods selected. Further, the variability observed in the collapse response is up to two times that after eliminating data outliers. Finally, the large variability obtained with the evaluated alternative probabilistic modeling methods suggests re-opening the technical discussion over the state of the practice often used in earthquake engineering to improve the decision-making process, mitigating earthquake-induced consequences in an environmentally, economically, and socially beneficial manner.

Keywords: probability distribution function; fragility analysis; probabilistic uncertainty; outlier detection method; sustainable cities; resilient environment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1668/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1668/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1668-:d:1340747

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().