Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic Analysis, and Optimization in a Natural Gas Decompression Station with a Vortex Tube and Geothermal Preheating

Luis F. Villalón-López, Víctor M. Ambriz-Díaz (), Carlos Rubio-Maya, Oscar Chávez and Israel Y. Rosas
Additional contact information
Luis F. Villalón-López: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “W” Building, Central Campus, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacán, Mexico
Víctor M. Ambriz-Díaz: Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico
Carlos Rubio-Maya: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, “W” Building, Central Campus, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacán, Mexico
Oscar Chávez: Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico
Israel Y. Rosas: Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-33

Abstract: Natural gas stations require a preheating stage to prevent the formation of hydrates inside of them provoked by a sudden decompression process of the natural gas. The preheating process has been investigated to improve efficiency and to reduce costs as well. This work studies the behavior of a natural gas decompression station with a first-stage preheating process using a vortex tube and a geothermal heat exchanger, followed by a second stage involving a water bath heater (heating vat). An energetic, exergetic, and exergoeconomic study has been carried out based on a mathematical model and the theory of exergetic cost, obtaining key thermodynamic and thermoeconomic variables, including exergy flows and equipment costs. A heat flow of 26.41 kW was obtained in the geothermal preheating stage; meanwhile, a 60.43 kW heat flow was obtained in the heating vat. The results showed a saving in station fuel using only 2.046% of the natural gas in the system at the second preheating stage. Also, the system was optimized, obtaining a 15.73% reduction in the decompressed natural gas cost. These findings show the possibility of implementing these systems in zones with many geothermal resources to reach a constant, profitable natural gas supply in areas where a pipeline network does not exist.

Keywords: natural gas decompression; geothermal energy; vortex tube; thermoeconomic analysis; optimization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1669/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1669/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1669-:d:1340795

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().