EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Low-Pressure Steam Generation with Concentrating Solar Energy and Different Heat Upgrade Technologies: Potential in the European Industry

Jorge Payá (), Antonio Cazorla-Marín, Cordin Arpagaus, José Luis Corrales Ciganda and Abdelrahman H. Hassan
Additional contact information
Jorge Payá: Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Antonio Cazorla-Marín: Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Cordin Arpagaus: Institute for Energy Systems, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, CH-9471 Buchs, Switzerland
José Luis Corrales Ciganda: TECNALIA, Basque Research and Tecnology Alliance (BRTA), Area Anardi 5, 20730 Azpeitia, Spain
Abdelrahman H. Hassan: Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-22

Abstract: The industry is currently responsible for around 21% of the total CO 2 emissions, mainly due to heat production with fossil fuel burners. There are already different technologies on the market that can potentially reduce CO 2 emissions. Nevertheless, the first step for their introduction is to analyze their potential on a global scale by detecting in which countries each of them is more attractive, given their energy prices and resources. The present work involves a techno-economic analysis of different alternatives to replace industrial gas boilers for low-pressure steam production at 120 °C and 150 °C. Solar Heat for Industrial Processes (SHIP) was compared with Electric Boilers (EBs), High-Temperature Heat Pumps (HTHPs), and Absorption Heat Transformers (AHTs). SHIP systems have the potential to reach payback periods in the range of 4 to 5 years in countries with Direct Normal Irradiance (DNI) values above 1400 kWh/m 2 /year, which is reached in Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal, and Romania. HTHPs and AHTs lead to the lowest payback periods, Levelized Cost of Heat (LCOH), and highest CO 2 emission savings. For both AHTs and HTHPs, payback periods of below 1.5 years can be reached, particularly in countries with electricity-to-gas price ratios below 2.0.

Keywords: high-temperature heat pumps; concentrating solar energy; SHIP; absorption heat transformers; techno-economic analysis; waste heat recovery (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1733/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1733/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1733-:d:1342190

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1733-:d:1342190