The Use of Financial Tools in Small-Scale Irrigated Crops to Assess Socioeconomic Sustainability: A Case Study in Tocantins-Araguaia Basin, Brazil

Gabriel Browne de Deus Ribeiro (), Maria das Dores Saraiva De Loreto, Edna Lopes Miranda, Rosária Cal Bastos, Catariny Cabral Aleman, Fernando França da Cunha and Paola Delatorre Rodrigues
Additional contact information
Gabriel Browne de Deus Ribeiro: Department of Forest and Wood Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, Brazil
Maria das Dores Saraiva De Loreto: Department of Home Economics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
Edna Lopes Miranda: Department of Home Economics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
Rosária Cal Bastos: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
Catariny Cabral Aleman: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
Fernando França da Cunha: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
Paola Delatorre Rodrigues: Department of Forest and Wood Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, Brazil

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-15

Abstract: To expand financial knowledge and promote the socioeconomic sustainability of agricultural production systems, this work applied financial instruments to small-scale irrigated crops, making use of agricultural projects from the Bom Sucesso/Santa Cruz Settlement, located in the Tocantins-Araguaia basin, Brazil. The economic viability indicators of two irrigated okra production systems (furrow and drip) were calculated using the following indicators: Net Present Value, Modified Internal Rate of Return, Cost–Benefit Index, Discounted Payback, and Average Cost of Production. And a risk assessment through sensitivity analysis, a tornado chart, and Monte Carlo simulation was performed in a simplified financial model. The economic viability results showed that both irrigated systems were economically viable, although the okra drip system had lower indicators and reduced financial resilience, with a 58% probability of success, while the furrow system’s was 89%. The crops’ financial return was mainly influenced by okra’s sale price and productivity, followed by harvesting and planting costs. The financial tools applied in this study demonstrated some key factors to assess socioeconomic sustainability, such as the necessity to increase producers’ organizational capacity and to achieve technical improvements, which could result in market power, competitive sale prices, lower input costs, and greater productivity. The applied instruments increased financial management and have the potential to the build economic and social strength in the area of small-scale irrigated crops, and they can be replicated using simplified tools for producers, companies, and policy makers.

Keywords: financial tools; irrigation; sustainability; agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1835/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1835/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1835-:d:1344366

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().