EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes in Landscape Ecological Risks and Indicator Weights: A Case Study of the Bailong River Basin

Quanxi Li, Biao Ma, Liwei Zhao, Zixuan Mao and Xuelu Liu ()
Additional contact information
Quanxi Li: College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Biao Ma: College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Liwei Zhao: College of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Zixuan Mao: College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Xuelu Liu: College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-25

Abstract: The land use and ecological environment of the Bailong River Basin (BRB) have undergone significant changes in the context of developing urban–rural integration and ecological conservation in western China. As a key ecologically fragile area in the west region, a landscape ecological risk (LER) assessment can reflect the extent to which human activities and environmental changes threaten the ecosystems in the BRB. This study aims to explore the empowerment of indicator weights in an LER assessment. Landscape index weights and LER were analyzed based on land use data for three periods using objective and combined empowerment methods. It was found that the weighting results had apparent scale dependence, and the entropy weight method had the best results in indicator empowerment. From 2000–2020, the LER presented reduced risk, increased heterogeneity, and reduced aggregation. The shift from a medium-risk area to a lower-risk area was the primary transfer type of LER in the study area, and the LER showed a decreasing development trend. So far, research on weight empowerment in LER evaluations has been urgent. This study improved the landscape ecological risk assessment system by selecting an empowerment method that optimally takes into account scale dependence while providing valuable insights into the sustainability of the landscape in this watershed.

Keywords: objective weighting method; combined weights; scale dependence; spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis; landscape ecological risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1915/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1915/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1915-:d:1346283

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1915-:d:1346283