Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework

Eduardo Santos, Fernando Fonseca, Aníbal Santiago and Daniel Rodrigues ()
Additional contact information
Eduardo Santos: Department of the Waste Management of the National Secretariat for Urban Environment and Environmental Quality, Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Esplanada dos Ministérios Bloco B sala 736, Brasília 70068-900, Brazil
Fernando Fonseca: CTAC (Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
Aníbal Santiago: Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Morro do Cruzeiro, Ouro Preto 35402-163, Brazil
Daniel Rodrigues: CTAC (Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 5, 1-20

Abstract: Municipal solid waste is a chronic problem in many developing countries like Brazil. Addressing the challenges of waste management requires robust frameworks for assessing the policies’ impacts. In this context, sustainability indicators may help decision-makers in adopting more efficient waste policies. The main goal of this study is to propose a framework for identifying and classifying indicators related to waste management within Brazilian public policies. This evaluation was based on extensive legislative surveys aimed at identifying goals, targets, and obligations outlined in these policies. A comprehensive Driving Force–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework was employed to identify and classify the usefulness of these indicators in the context of waste management. A total of 151 indicators were identified, alongside 283 waste goals, targets, and obligations, which were primarily related to municipal waste and were mostly sourced from plans, laws, presidential decrees, and collegiate resolutions. Within the framework, 66 indicators, mostly related to waste collection and recycling, were deemed useful, comprising 34 classified as Responses, 14 as Pressures, six as Driving Forces, four as States, two as Impacts, and six as Pressure/Responses. The challenges associated with the DPSIR framework and strategies to enhance the efficiency of public waste policies in Brazil are also discussed.

Keywords: urban solid waste; recycling; waste policies; circular economy; planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2192/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2192/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2192-:d:1352153

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().