A Comparison of the Co-Treatment of Urban Wastewater and Acidic Water Using a Ternary Emergy Diagram

Luigi Bravo Toledo (), Jorge Alberto Montaño Pisfil, César Augusto Rodríguez Aburto, Edgar del Águila Vela, José Antonio Poma García, Claudia Rossana Poma García, Jorge Luis Poma García and Beatriz Montaño Miranda
Additional contact information
Luigi Bravo Toledo: Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Natural Resources, Universidad Nacional del Callao, Callao 07011, Peru
Jorge Alberto Montaño Pisfil: Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Callao, Callao 07011, Peru
César Augusto Rodríguez Aburto: Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Callao, Callao 07011, Peru
Edgar del Águila Vela: Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Callao, Callao 07011, Peru
José Antonio Poma García: Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Callao, Callao 07011, Peru
Claudia Rossana Poma García: Departament of Postgraduate, Universidad César Vallejo, Lima 15491, Peru
Jorge Luis Poma García: Faculty of Architecture, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12006, Peru
Beatriz Montaño Miranda: Faculty of Economics and Planning, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 7, 1-15

Abstract: The Pasco region in Peru is an area that has historically been polluted by mining activity and population growth. As a result, there is an increased production of urban wastewater and acidic water that contaminate local lakes such as Quiulacocha and Patarcocha. The construction of a treatment plant that can treat the different types of wastewaters has not yet been studied, and its sustainability has not yet been evaluated. The objective of this research was to predict the sustainability of co-treatment systems in different scenarios between urban wastewater and acidic water, expressed in terms of a ternary emergy diagram. The design of the co-treatment plant was carried out at an inflow of 10 L/s. The first scenario (Treatment I) has a primary settler for the mixture of urban wastewater and acidic water, while the second scenario (Treatment II) involves a settler and a subsurface artificial wetland, and the third scenario (Treatment IIIa and IIb) presents a settler, an electrocoagulation system and a secondary settler; this scenario differentiates between the use of urban wastewater and eutrophicated water from Patarcocha Lake. The results of the ternary diagram show the contributions of the fractions of renewable resources from Treatment I (69%), from Treatment II (65.7%), from Treatment IIIa (61.6%), and from Treatment IIIb (21.8%); the fractions of non-renewable resources in Treatment I (26.13%), Treatment II (24.13%), Treatment IIIa (23.33%), and Treatment IIIb (9.50%); and the fractions of imported inputs in Treatment I (4.84%), Treatment II (9.37%), Treatment IIIa (15.04%), and Treatment IIIb (68.72%). It is concluded that the use of a co-treatment system for urban wastewater and acidic water is sustainable in the long term when using an electrocoagulator or an artificial wetland.

Keywords: sustainability; eutrophication; emergy; exergy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2609/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2609/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2609-:d:1361672

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().