Simulation-Based Learning and Argumentation to Promote Informed Design Decision-Making Processes within a First-Year Engineering Technology Course

Miguel A. Feijoo-Garcia, Mark S. Holstrom, Alejandra J. Magana () and Brittany A. Newell
Additional contact information
Miguel A. Feijoo-Garcia: Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, 401 N. Grant St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Mark S. Holstrom: Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, 401 N. Grant St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Alejandra J. Magana: Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, 401 N. Grant St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Brittany A. Newell: School of Engineering Technology, Purdue University, 401 N. Grant St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 7, 1-27

Abstract: Analyzing the integration of scientific knowledge to guide decision-making processes supporting design challenges in engineering education is critical. However, effectively engaging in informed design decision-making processes is challenging, particularly in the context of online education. Simulation-based learning can bring authentic design practices to online education, but effective guidance and scaffolding must be provided to learners. Therefore, this research investigates the implications of integrating simulation-based learning with an argumentation framework to guide students in incorporating scientific knowledge into their design decisions, particularly in designing energy-efficient housing. This study took place during online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was implemented within a first-year engineering technology undergraduate course. It aimed to analyze students’ decision-making processes when designing a zero-energy home for a Midwestern city using Aladdin, an integrated CAD/CAE platform that can be used to design a structure and simulate its function within a single system. This study investigates how students informed their decision-making processes in design for energy-efficient homes and the recurring trends in students’ designs related to economic decision making and energy science. The overall results show how cost constraints significantly influenced students’ observation and argumentation processes during their design challenge, highlighting the pivotal role of economic considerations in shaping their decision making. Moreover, the findings underscore the importance of holistic approaches in providing insights into teaching strategies for online learning, particularly in navigating the intersection of scientific and economic factors in design challenges.

Keywords: engineering education; simulation-based learning; trade-offs; argumentation framework; problem solving; learning analytics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2633/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2633/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2633-:d:1362246

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().