Towards Sustainable Material: Optimizing Geopolymer Mortar Formulations for 3D Printing: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Charlotte Roux (), Julien Archez, Corentin Le Gall, Myriam Saadé, Adélaïde Féraille and Jean-François Caron
Additional contact information
Charlotte Roux: MINES Paris—PSL Research University, CEEP (Centre Energie Environnement Procédés), 60 Boulevard Saint Michel, 75006 Paris, France
Julien Archez: Navier Laboratory, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Gustave Eiffel University CNRS, 77454 Champs sur Marne, France
Corentin Le Gall: Navier Laboratory, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Gustave Eiffel University CNRS, 77454 Champs sur Marne, France
Myriam Saadé: Navier Laboratory, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Gustave Eiffel University CNRS, 77454 Champs sur Marne, France
Adélaïde Féraille: Navier Laboratory, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Gustave Eiffel University CNRS, 77454 Champs sur Marne, France
Jean-François Caron: Navier Laboratory, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Gustave Eiffel University CNRS, 77454 Champs sur Marne, France

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 8, 1-20

Abstract: Geopolymer-based concretes have been elaborated among others for their potential to lower the environmental impact of the construction sector. The rheology and workability of fresh geopolymers make them suitable for new applications such as 3D printing. In this paper, we aim to develop a potassium silicate- and metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar with sand and local earth additions suited for 3D printing and an environmental assessment framework for this material. The methodology aims at the optimization of both the granular skeleton and the geopolymer matrix for the development of a low-environmental-impact material suited for 3D printing. Using this approach, various metakaolin/earth geopolymer mortars are explored from a mechanical and environmental point of view. The environmental assessment of the lab-scale process shows an improvement for the climate change category but a degradation of other indicators, compared to Portland-cement-based concrete. Several promising options exist to further optimize the process and decrease its environmental impacts. This constitutes the main research perspective of this work.

Keywords: sustainable material; geopolymers; 3D printing; material characterization; environmental optimization; life cycle assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3328/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3328/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3328-:d:1376597

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().