How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry

Pao-Hsiang Hsi () and Joseph C. P. Shieh
Additional contact information
Pao-Hsiang Hsi: Graduate Institute of Finance, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
Joseph C. P. Shieh: Graduate Institute of Finance, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 9, 1-17

Abstract: To support the bankability of PV projects, PV manufacturers have been offering one of the longest warranties in the world, typically in the range of 25–30 years. During the warranty period, PV manufacturers guarantee that the degradation of PV modules will not exceed 0.4–0.6% each year, or the buyer can at any time make a claim to the manufacturer for replacement or compensation for the shortfall. Due to its popularity, the performance warranty terms have become more and more competitive each year. However, long-term PV operating data have been very limited and bankruptcy of PV manufacturers has been quite common. Without a proper methodology to assess the adequacy of PV manufacturer’s warranty fund (WF) reserve, the 25-year performance warranty can become empty promises. To ensure sustainable development of the PV industry, this study develops a probability-weighted expected value method to determine the necessary WF reserve based on benchmark field degradation data and prevailing degradation cap of 0.55% per year. The simulation result shows that, unless the manufacturer’s degradation pattern is significantly better than the benchmark degradation profile, 1.302% of the sales value is required for the WF reserve. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that provides WF reserve requirement estimation for 25-year PV performance warranty. The result will provide transparency for PV investors and motivation for PV manufacturers for continuous quality improvement as all such achievement can now be reflected in manufacturers’ annual report result.

Keywords: PV industry sustainability; clean energy transition; PV warranty; PV degradation rate; PV investment; bankability; IAS 37; expected shortfall; probability-weighted expected value; warranty cost; warranty fund; risk management; quality improvement; IEC 61215 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3880/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3880/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3880-:d:1389237

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().