Prioritizing Smart City Themes for Multi-National Enterprises and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Neeraj Sharma, Rupesh Kumar, Nitin Simha Vihari, Madhu Arora and Jatinderkumar R. Saini ()
Additional contact information
Neeraj Sharma: Department of Management Studies, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248002, India
Rupesh Kumar: Jindal Global Business School (JGBS), O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat 131001, India
Nitin Simha Vihari: Business School, Middlesex University, Dubai P.O. Box 500697, United Arab Emirates
Madhu Arora: Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India
Jatinderkumar R. Saini: Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-30

Abstract: Cities’ role as major hubs of human activity and economic development is essential in attaining sustainable development, fostering a balance between economic, social, and environmental development, especially in light of the growing concern over Anthropocene-induced environmental issues like global warming and climate change. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent a historic call for coordinated international action in this area, with SDG 11 specifically identifying “Sustainable Cities and Communities” as a primary objective. Therefore, it is clear that a paradigm shift in our approach to these challenges in terms of our thinking, sensibility, behavior, and responses is necessary. Implicitly, in view of their pivotal role in environmental sustainability, development of “smart” cities as healthy, citizen-friendly, economically viable, and sustainable cities for our future generations in today’s globally integrated world, as predominant centers of human settlement and activity with multinational enterprises driving economic growth, gains the immediate attention of researchers. In this light, this study aims to identify and thereafter prioritize key indicators of a smart city using the structured and consistency-focused best–worst multi-criteria decision-making (BWM) method, suitable for expert-driven decision-making with limited comparisons. While the UN’s SDG 11 promotes safe and resilient cities, our findings suggest a disparity in how local officials prioritize certain dimensions such as safety or recreation. This disconnect warrants closer examination of localized policy drivers. The findings of this study indicate that according to experts, among others, the priority themes are, in order, water and sanitation, wastewater, health, the environment, and the economy. Thus, these represent a key take-away for multinational enterprises for identifying and assessing significant thrust domains and areas of opportunity for intervention and contribution to the UN SDGs. It also enables a replicable framework for synergy between the public and private sectors towards contrastive intervention in other cities across the globe.

Keywords: UN; SDG; smart city; sustainability; multinational enterprises; best–worst method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4251/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4251/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4251-:d:1651131

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().