Gaming Polarisation: Using Agent-Based Simulations as a Dialogue Tool

Shaoni Wang () and Wander Jager ()
Additional contact information
Shaoni Wang: Groningen Center for Social Complexity Studies, University of Groningen, Hoendiepskade 23/24, 9718 BG Groningen, The Netherlands
Wander Jager: Groningen Center for Social Complexity Studies, University of Groningen, Hoendiepskade 23/24, 9718 BG Groningen, The Netherlands

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-29

Abstract: Transitioning to sustainable systems often faces significant challenges. People from different backgrounds often have different views on sustainability, which may lead to group polarisation. To promote collective participation in the transition to sustainability, it is critical to understand the drivers of polarisation and promote inclusiveness in decision-making. We developed a Dialogue Tool based on the HUMAT framework to explore opinion dynamics such as polarisation in the community and find potential pathways to reconcile when division occurs. By simulating dissatisfaction, division, and reconciliation in the community, we studied how individual characteristics (such as openness to change and assertiveness) affect collective decisions. Furthermore, the Dialogue Tool can be used to test possible interventions to reduce polarisation and increase community satisfaction. Visual representations of community dynamics under different scenarios within the Dialogue Tool have the potential to foster meaningful dialogues among stakeholders, which may promote a deeper reflection on community collaboration. While limitations such as simplifications and lack of empirical calibration limit the predictive accuracy of the Dialogue Tool (although this is not its goal), it still shows strong potential for educational and policy applications. It offers insights into social influences, conformity, and polarisation in community settings, making it a promising tool for fostering inclusive, informed decision-making and strengthening community participation in sustainable development transitions.

Keywords: Dialogue Tool; polarisation; agent-based modelling; democratic innovation; sustainability transitions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4341/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4341/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4341-:d:1653358

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().