Performance Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Gaussian Plume Models: Their Application in the Prairie Grass Project

Ruben Cabello, Carles Troyano Ferré, Alexandra Elena Plesu Popescu, Jordi Bonet, Joan Llorens and Raúl Arasa Agudo ()
Additional contact information
Ruben Cabello: Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí I Franquès, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Carles Troyano Ferré: Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí I Franquès, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Alexandra Elena Plesu Popescu: Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí I Franquès, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Jordi Bonet: Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí I Franquès, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Joan Llorens: Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí I Franquès, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Raúl Arasa Agudo: Applied Research, Meteosim, Baldiri I Reixac 10th, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-25

Abstract: Nowadays, industries and society are very concerned about pollution, well-being, health, air quality, and the possible negative effects of industrial emissions on a property’s surroundings. This gas dispersion is typically estimated with Gaussian Plume/Puff Models or software that uses these models with slight adjustments. The issue regarding these models is that they do not consider the surroundings’ particularities, for instance, when obstacles are present, and they require experimental data to adapt to specific scenarios. Therefore, the aim of this work is to validate the use of ANSYS Fluent ® 2022 R1 for modelling atmospheric gas dispersion. This validation is performed by comparing the ANSYS Fluent ® 2022 R1 findings to published experimental data, Gaussian Plume Models (GPM in this case corresponds to the application of the Gaussian Equation or Gaussian Fit, and does not correspond to a specific dispersion model), and ALOHA 5.4.7 software. A comparison between these three alternatives was not available in the literature. In terms of downwind dispersion, the findings of the three models are extremely comparable. However, ANSYS Fluent ® has a propensity to overestimate the concentration at higher heights. Validation using ANSYS Fluent ® in atmospheric gas dispersion applications enables confident results to be obtained in other scenarios. Differences in pollutant estimation between models are clear when studying more complex cases containing turbulence-inducing geometries. In these cases, CFD exhibits a more realistic description of the transport phenomena than the other models considered. The Prairie Grass Project is used as a tool to validate the CFD model, and to demonstrate its potential for more complex cases.

Keywords: atmospheric gas release; emission; ANSYS; Gaussian Plume Models; ALOHA; air quality; dispersion modelling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4403/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4403/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4403-:d:1654264

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().