Integrating Sustainability Indicators in Conceptual Design of Footbridges: A Decision-Support Framework for Environmental, Economic, and Structural Performance

Valeria Gozzi () and Leidy Guante Henriquez
Additional contact information
Valeria Gozzi: DACD—Department of Environment Constructions and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
Leidy Guante Henriquez: DACD—Department of Environment Constructions and Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-26

Abstract: Sustainability is increasingly prioritized in infrastructure design; however, its integration into the conceptual design phase remains limited, particularly for pedestrian bridges, where structural performance plays a critical role. While existing frameworks address environmental and economic impacts in later stages, they typically fail to incorporate structural performance and sustainability holistically at the outset. To address this gap, this study introduces a quantitative decision-support framework tailored for the conceptual design of footbridges. The methodology integrates five key indicators, Global Warming Potential (GI), Total Cost (TC), Robustness (RO), Inspection (IN), and Maintenance (MA), using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach, specifically the Weighted Sum Model (WSM), supported by Pearson correlation analysis, to identify trade-offs and interdependencies among metrics. The framework is tested on two real-world case studies involving steel pedestrian bridges in different urban contexts. The results reveal a strong correlation between inspection and maintenance, suggesting that designs optimized for inspection accessibility can significantly reduce life cycle maintenance efforts and costs. Robustness appears to be largely independent from environmental impact, indicating the potential to improve structural resilience without compromising sustainability. Furthermore, cost–sustainability relationships are shown to be highly context-dependent. The practical implications of these findings are substantial: by offering a structured, data-driven tool for early-stage evaluation, the framework enables engineers, urban planners, and policymakers to make informed design choices that align with long-term sustainability goals. It offers a methodological basis for comparing design options based on quantifiable sustainability and structural metrics, contributing to evidence-based decision making in line with evolving standards for sustainable infrastructure.

Keywords: sustainability assessment; conceptual bridge design; life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle costing (LCC); social life cycle assessment (S-LCA); multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); structural robustness; maintenance; inspection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4562/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4562/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4562-:d:1657438

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().