Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning

Hanna Hrinchenko, Olha Prokopenko (), Aziza Karbekova, Nataliia Antonenko, Nataliia Kovshun, Tetiana Kubakh and Serhii Poliushkin
Additional contact information
Hanna Hrinchenko: Department of Automation, Metrology and Energy Efficient Technologies, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine
Olha Prokopenko: Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences, Suur-Sojamae 10a, 11415 Tallinn, Estonia
Aziza Karbekova: Department of Economics, Accounting and Finance, Jalal-Abad State University Named After B. Osmonov, Lenin St. 57, Jalal-Abad 715600, Kyrgyzstan
Nataliia Antonenko: Department of Automation, Metrology and Energy Efficient Technologies, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine
Nataliia Kovshun: Department of Enterprise Economics and International Business, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Soborna St. 11, 33028 Rivne, Ukraine
Tetiana Kubakh: Department of Financial Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Sumy State University, Petropavlivska St. 59, 40014 Sumy, Ukraine
Serhii Poliushkin: Department of Design and Reconstruction of Architectural Environment, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 10, 1-23

Abstract: This study proposes a decision-making model based on the economic assessment of phased decommissioning of energy facilities, specifically focusing on a nuclear power plant (NPP). The objective of the research is to develop and validate an economic assessment methodology for comparing immediate and deferred dismantling strategies for a 1000 MW NPP unit. For economic justification, a comparison of the economic expenses is proposed based on the accumulation of radioactive waste, safety activities, and labour costs for the two options. The methods employed include a multifactorial analysis based on expert assessments, considering economic expenses related to radioactive waste accumulation, safety activities, and labour costs. Criteria with differences exceeding 10% for quantitative indicators and fundamental differences for qualitative indicators were deemed significant; each criterion’s acceptability was weighted accordingly. The key results show that deferred dismantling is economically preferable; the total score for deferred dismantling exceeds that of immediate dismantling by approximately 10% (14.16 points vs. 15.86 points). A comparison of block schedules for decommissioning, dynamics of labour costs, and annual volumes of reprocessed radioactive waste for the baseline and optimised deferred dismantling options shows that both options meet the continuity condition of the ‘active’ stages. At the same time, the optimised option demonstrates significant advantages in the uniformity of labour costs and workload of radioactive waste treatment plants during dismantling. The activities at the stage of power unit decommissioning are proposed to be carried out within the licence framework for its operation by the organisational and technical solutions to ensure safety during operation. The deterministic consequences and risks will align with the safety assessment, which will be determined based on the latest analysis results, taking into account sustainable operation.

Keywords: decommissioning; power unit; nuclear power plant; radioactive waste; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4610/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4610/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4610-:d:1658373

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().