EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing Supply and Demand Discrepancies of Urban Green Space in High-Density Built-Up Areas Based on Vitality Impacts: Evidence from Beijing’s Central Districts, China

Jingyi Han (), Shoubang Huang, Shiyang Zhang, Qing Lin and Xiangrong Wang ()
Additional contact information
Jingyi Han: School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Shoubang Huang: School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Shiyang Zhang: School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Qing Lin: School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Xiangrong Wang: School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-31

Abstract: In rapidly urbanizing areas, there is a notable aggregation of vitality in high-density urban environments, accompanied by an increasing discrepancy between the supply and demand of urban green space (UGS). This study presented an integrated framework comprising a model for UGS supply-demand coupling coordination and a measure of urban vitality. Using downtown Beijing as a case study, the Gini coefficient assessed UGS supply-demand disparities across different vitality types. The study examined how UGS supply and demand factors interact with urban vitality, revealing the impact of UGS supply-demand imbalances on various dimensions of vitality and the UGS mismatches experienced by different vitality groups. The study showed that: (1) 63.29% of central Beijing’s areas had low UGS supply-demand coordination, with 39.23% experiencing UGS mismatches; (2) UGS supply and demand were significantly correlated with urban vitality spatial distribution; (3) these factors significantly impacted urban comprehensive vitality; (4) and there were notable UGS distribution disparities among vitality groups, with economic vitality group perceiving the greatest inequity (Gini = 0.311), followed by social vitality (Gini = 0.289) and cultural vitality group (Gini = 0.247). These findings offer valuable insights for a more refined assessment and enhancement of UGS, aiming to achieve balanced, high-quality, and sustainable urban development.

Keywords: urban green spaces; high-density built-up areas; urban vitality; Beijing central districts; coupling-coordination degree; supply and demand match (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4828/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4828/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4828-:d:1663241

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4828-:d:1663241