The Nexus Between Biodiversity and Sovereign Credit Ratings: Global Environmental and Economic Interdependencies from a Sustainability Perspective
Ayberk Şeker and
Mahmut Kadir İşgüven ()
Additional contact information
Ayberk Şeker: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of International Trade and Logistics, Bursa Technical University, Bursa 16330, Türkiye
Mahmut Kadir İşgüven: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Bursa Technical University, Bursa 16330, Türkiye
Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-26
Abstract:
This study explores the nuanced relationship between biodiversity and sovereign credit ratings, underscoring the link between environmental sustainability and economic resilience. As credit rating methodologies increasingly incorporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions alongside traditional macroeconomic indicators, biodiversity has emerged as a vital factor influencing sovereign creditworthiness. Drawing on a panel dataset of 62 countries—representing 91% of the global GDP and 81% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions—from 2001 to 2021, the research utilizes advanced econometric techniques, including the panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and panel quantile regression. The GMM analysis indicates that higher biodiversity levels are generally associated with a decline in credit ratings. However, the quantile regression provides a more differentiated view, revealing that biodiversity’s impact varies by a country’s existing credit standing. Specifically, nations with lower credit ratings tend to benefit from richer biodiversity, while countries with higher credit ratings show a modest negative association—reflecting structural and institutional differences. Robustness checks confirm these results, highlighting the relevance of biodiversity indicators such as the Red List Index in credit evaluations. The findings support the integration of biodiversity into sovereign risk assessments to enhance the alignment of financial systems with long-term ecological and economic sustainability goals.
Keywords: environmental sustainability; biodiversity; red list index; nature loss; Sovereign credit ratings; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4977/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4977/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4977-:d:1666968
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().