Energy Optimization Gaps in Hotel Retrofits for Subtropical Climates

Milen Balbis Morejón (), Oskar Cabello Justafré, Juan José Cabello Eras, Javier M. Rey-Hernández and Francisco Javier Rey-Martínez
Additional contact information
Milen Balbis Morejón: Department of Energy, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58 No. 55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
Oskar Cabello Justafré: Departament of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Cienfuegos, Carretera a Rodas, km 4, Cienfuegos 5GFX+2QG, CS, Cuba
Juan José Cabello Eras: Departament of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Córdoba, Carrera 6 No. 77-305, Montería 230002, Colombia
Javier M. Rey-Hernández: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Engines, Engineering School, University of Malaga (UMa), 29016 Málaga, Spain
Francisco Javier Rey-Martínez: GIRTER Research Group, Consolidated Research Unit (UIC053) of Castile and Leon, 47011 Valladolid, Spain

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-17

Abstract: This study investigates the significant energy optimization gaps in hotel retrofits in a subtropical climate, quantifying the missed energy-saving opportunities through advanced simulation techniques. Utilizing Design Builder software, the energy consumption of a hotel in Cienfuegos (Cuba) was assessed both before and after renovation, focusing on passive strategies (e.g., replacing single-glazed windows with double glazing) and active interventions (e.g., upgrading the air conditioning system). The results reveal that current retrofit strategies fail to reduce energy consumption substantially. Replacing single-glazed windows with double glazing could reduce annual energy use by 42%. Additionally, upgrading the existing chiller system or implementing a Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) system could result in 40% and 59.5% energy savings, respectively. The most significant energy reduction, 71%, is achieved when both interventions—upgrading the chiller and installing double-glazed windows—are implemented, reducing the energy consumption index (ECI) to a quarter of its current value. The life cycle cost (LCC) analysis demonstrates that energy-efficient investments offer considerable economic returns. For instance, an investment of USD 508,600 in a modern chiller system would generate net savings of USD 1,373,500 over its operational lifespan. This study underscores substantial economic and environmental losses from omitting energy efficiency considerations in hotel renovations. It calls for integrating comprehensive energy optimization strategies in retrofit planning, with each dollar invested in energy-saving measures potentially yielding USD 2.5 in life cycle savings. This approach is crucial for global hotel markets facing energy challenges.

Keywords: energy optimization; hotel retrofits; LCC; energy savings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5167/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5167/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5167-:d:1671804

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().