Highway-Transportation-Asset Criticality Estimation Leveraging Stakeholder Input Through an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Kwadwo Amankwah-Nkyi (), Sarah Hernandez and Suman Kumar Mitra
Additional contact information
Kwadwo Amankwah-Nkyi: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Sarah Hernandez: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Suman Kumar Mitra: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 11, 1-19

Abstract: Transportation agencies face increasing challenges in identifying and prioritizing which infrastructure assets are most critical to maintain and protect, particularly amid aging networks, limited budgets, and growing threats from climate change and extreme events. However, existing prioritization approaches often lack consistency and fail to adequately incorporate diverse stakeholder perspectives. This study develops a systematic, stakeholder-informed method for ranking transportation assets based on their criticality to the overall transportation system. As a novel approach, we use the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and present a case study of the applied approach. Six criteria were identified for ranking assets: annual average daily traffic (AADT), redundancy, freight output, roadway classification, Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI), and tourism. Stakeholder input was collected via an AHP-based survey using pairwise comparisons and translated into weighted rankings. Thirty complete responses (13.2% response rate) from experts (i.e., engineers, analysts, planners, etc.) were analyzed, with the resulting ranks from highest to lowest priority being AADT, redundancy, freight output, roadway classification, SoVI, and tourism. Stability analysis confirmed that rankings were consistent with a minimum of 15 responses. The resulting method provides a practical, replicable tool for agencies to perform statewide vulnerability/resiliency assessments ensuring that decision-making reflects a broad range of expert perspectives.

Keywords: asset criticality; analytical hierarchy process; transportation resilience; multi-criteria analysis; sustainable transportation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5212/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5212/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5212-:d:1672699

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().