EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of Personal Ecological Footprints for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: A Case Study in the UK

Ahmed Abugabal, Mawada Abdellatif (), Ana Armada Bras and Laurence Brady
Additional contact information
Ahmed Abugabal: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
Mawada Abdellatif: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
Ana Armada Bras: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
Laurence Brady: Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 12, 1-36

Abstract: Climate change is one of our most critical challenges, requiring urgent and comprehensive action across all levels of society. Individual actions and their roles in mitigating and adapting to climate change remain underexplored, despite global efforts. Under this context, this study was conducted to evaluate the ecological footprint of individuals for climate change mitigation. A structured online survey was designed and distributed through email lists, social media platforms, and community organisations to over 200 potential participants in the northwest of the UK. Due to the anonymous nature of the survey, only 83 individuals from diverse demographics completed the questionnaire. A carbon footprint calculator using conversion factors has been employed, based on energy consumption, travel, and material goods use. Participants are categorised into four groups based on their annual CO 2 emissions, ranging from less than 2 tonnes to over 10 tonnes. Personalised recommendations provided by the calculator focus on practical strategies, including adopting renewable energy, minimising unnecessary consumption, and opting for sustainable transportation. Results showed that only 5.5% of participants who employed advanced technologies and smart home technologies, 1.8% were implementing water-saving practices and 65.4% preferred to use their own car over other modes of transportation. In addition, the study found that 67.3% of participants had no or only a very limited knowledge of renewable energy technologies, indicating a need for education and awareness campaigns. The findings also highlight the importance of addressing demographic differences in ecological footprints, as these variations can provide insights into tailored policy interventions. Overall, despite the study’s limited sample size, this research contributes to the growing body of evidence on the importance of individual action in combating climate change and provides actionable insights for policymakers and educators aiming to foster a more sustainable lifestyle. Future studies with larger samples are recommended to validate and expand upon these findings.

Keywords: climate change mitigation; cultural practices; ecological footprint; offset project; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5415/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5415/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5415-:d:1677158

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-06-13
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5415-:d:1677158