Does Public Transport Planning Consider Mobility of Care? A Critical Policy Review of Toronto, Canada

Rebecca Smith, Poorva Jain, Emily Grisé, Geneviève Boisjoly and Léa Ravensbergen ()
Additional contact information
Rebecca Smith: School of Earth, Environment & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
Poorva Jain: School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
Emily Grisé: School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
Geneviève Boisjoly: Département des Génies Civil, Géologique et des Mines, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
Léa Ravensbergen: School of Earth, Environment & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 12, 1-16

Abstract: The concept ‘mobility of care’ captures all the daily travel necessary for the upkeep of a household, including trips to grocery stores, health-related appointments, errands, and caring activities for dependents. Since it was originally coined in 2009, a handful of studies have shown how poorly mobility of care trips are captured in transportation surveys. These preliminary analyses also find that care trips comprise a substantial proportion of daily mobility. As women disproportionately engage in ‘mobility of care’ travel, the under-consideration of care trips is argued to result in a gender bias in transport planning. Despite this, transport policy related to mobility of care has received less attention. Given that transport policy shapes how transport systems operate, this paper explores the extent to which recent transport policies consider mobility of care. A critical policy review framework is used to systematically examine seven policy documents (435 pages) from the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), the largest transit agency in Canada. Results indicate that mobility of care is rarely directly considered or significantly discussed. Instead, transport policy often uses the commute to work as the default trip. Mentions of care destinations and trip characteristics associated with mobility of care are more common in recent years and most frequently discussed in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic or specialized services for seniors and people with disabilities. Policies that likely facilitate mobility of care indirectly are also identified, including fare discounts, transfer windows, and accessibility policies. The review concludes with preliminary recommendations on how transit agencies can more directly plan for mobility of care.

Keywords: mobility of care; gender; policy review; public transit policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5466/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5466/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5466-:d:1678457

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().