Landscape Services from the Perspective of Experts and Their Use by the Local Community: A Comparative Study of Selected Landscape Types in a Region in Central Europe

Piotr Krajewski (), Marek Furmankiewicz, Marta Sylla, Iga Kołodyńska and Monika Lebiedzińska
Additional contact information
Piotr Krajewski: Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
Marek Furmankiewicz: Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
Marta Sylla: Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
Iga Kołodyńska: Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
Monika Lebiedzińska: Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 15, 1-27

Abstract: This study investigates the concept of landscape services (LS), which integrate environmental and sociocultural dimensions of sustainable development. Recognizing landscapes as essential to daily life and well-being, the research aims to support sustainable spatial planning by analyzing both their potential and their actual use. The study has three main objectives: (1) to assess the potential of 16 selected landscape types to provide six key LS through expert evaluation; (2) to determine actual LS usage patterns among the local community (residents); and (3) to identify agreements and discrepancies between expert assessments and resident use. The services analyzed include providing space for daily activities; regulating spatial structure through diversity and compositional richness; enhancing physical and mental health; enabling passive and active recreation; supporting personal fulfillment; and fostering social interaction. Expert-based surveys and participatory mapping with residents were used to assess the provision and use of LS. The results indicate consistent evaluations for forest and historical urban landscapes (high potential and use) and mining and transportation landscapes (low potential and use). However, significant differences emerged for mountain LS, rated highly by experts but used minimally by residents. These insights highlight the importance of aligning expert planning with community needs to promote sustainable land use policies and reduce spatial conflicts.

Keywords: landscape services; expert evaluation; ecosystem services; landscape perception; participatory mapping; landscape management; Poland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6998/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6998/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6998-:d:1715926

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().