Evolutionary Game Theory in Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review of Collaborative Decision-Making, Operational Strategies, and Coordination Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Integration

Kun Wang, Lefeng Cheng (), Meng Yin, Kuozhen Zhang (), Ruikun Wang, Mengya Zhang and Runbao Sun
Additional contact information
Kun Wang: Institute for Human Rights, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Lefeng Cheng: School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Meng Yin: School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Kuozhen Zhang: Law School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
Ruikun Wang: School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Mengya Zhang: School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Runbao Sun: School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 16, 1-153

Abstract: As global energy systems transition towards greater reliance on renewable energy sources, the integration of energy storage systems (ESSs) becomes increasingly critical to managing the intermittency and variability associated with renewable generation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the application of evolutionary game theory (EGT) to optimize ESSs, emphasizing its role in enhancing decision-making processes, operation scheduling, and multi-agent coordination within dynamic, decentralized energy environments. A significant contribution of this paper is the incorporation of negotiation mechanisms and collaborative decision-making frameworks, which are essential for effective multi-agent coordination in complex systems. Unlike traditional game-theoretic models, EGT accounts for bounded rationality and strategic adaptation, offering a robust tool for modeling the interactions among stakeholders such as energy producers, consumers, and storage operators. The paper first addresses the key challenges in integrating ESS into modern power grids, particularly with high penetration of intermittent renewable energy. It then introduces the foundational principles of EGT and compares its advantages over classical game theory in capturing the evolving strategies of agents within these complex environments. A key innovation explored in this review is the hybridization of game-theoretic models, combining the stability of classical game theory with the adaptability of EGT, providing a comprehensive approach to resource allocation and coordination. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of deliberative democracy and process-based negotiation decision-making mechanisms in optimizing ESS operations, proposing a shift towards more inclusive, transparent, and consensus-driven decision-making. The review also examines several case studies where EGT has been successfully applied to optimize both local and large-scale ESSs, demonstrating its potential to enhance system efficiency, reduce operational costs, and improve reliability. Additionally, hybrid models incorporating evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimization have shown superior performance compared to traditional methods. The future directions for EGT in ESS optimization are discussed, emphasizing the integration of artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and blockchain technologies to address current challenges such as data scarcity, computational complexity, and scalability. These interdisciplinary innovations are expected to drive the development of more resilient, efficient, and flexible energy systems capable of supporting a decarbonized energy future.

Keywords: evolutionary game theory; energy storage systems (ESSs); decision optimization; operation scheduling; multi-agent coordination; renewable energy integration; negotiation mechanisms; collaborative decision-making; deliberative democracy; process-based decision-making; hybrid game models; resource allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7400/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7400/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7400-:d:1725531

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().