Street Trees as Sustainable Urban Air Purifiers: A Methodological Approach to Assessing Particulate Matter Phytofiltration

Karolina Kais (), Marzena Suchocka, Olga Balcerzak and Arkadiusz Przybysz ()
Additional contact information
Karolina Kais: Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
Marzena Suchocka: Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
Olga Balcerzak: Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
Arkadiusz Przybysz: Centre for Climate Research SGGW, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 16, 1-17

Abstract: PM 2.5 is an air pollutant that has a direct link to increased cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality, which has been demonstrated in numerous studies. Existing research highlights species-specific variations in the capacity of trees to capture and retain particulate matter (PM). However, a critical gap remains regarding sensitivity analyses of i-Tree Eco model assumptions. Such analyses are crucial for validating the model’s PM deposition estimates against empirically derived efficiencies, a deficiency that the present study addresses. The study consisted of two steps: a tree inventory was carried out at three selected sites, based on which, an ecosystem service analysis was performed using i-Tree Eco, and samples were taken from the leaves of trees at the analysed sites, which were the basis for comparing the data from the i-Tree Eco method and laboratory methods. The study focused on comparing PM 2.5 and PM 10 removal estimates derived from both the model and laboratory measurements. The results revealed significant discrepancies between the modelled and laboratory values. A comparison of the average annual PM 10 accumulation measured using laboratory methods for individual tree species showed that Tilia sp. achieved 24%, Fraxinus sp. 47.6%, Aesculus sp. 50.77%, and Quercus robur 23.4% of the PM 10 uptake efficiency estimated by the i-Tree Eco model. For PM 2.5 uptake, the values obtained through both methods were more consistent. Furthermore, trees growing under more challenging environmental conditions exhibited smaller diameter at breast height (DBH) and lower PM 10 and PM 2.5 removal efficiency according to both methods. While I-Tree Eco incorporates tree biophysical characteristics and health status, its methodology currently lacks the resolution to reflect site-specific environmental conditions and local pollutant concentrations at the individual tree level. Therefore, laboratory methods are indispensable for calibrating, validating, and supplementing i-Tree Eco estimates, especially when applied to diverse urban environments. Only the combined application of empirical and model-based methods provides a comprehensive understanding of the potential of urban greenery to improve air quality.

Keywords: air pollution; air phytofiltration; method comparison; urban trees; ecosystem services; sustainable cities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7451/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7451/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7451-:d:1727230

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().