EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Systematic Review of Households’ Fecal Sludge Management Situation to Identify Gaps and Improve Services: A Case of Kigali City, Rwanda

Marie Leonce Murebwayire, Erik Nilsson (), Innocent Nhapi and Umaru Garba Wali
Additional contact information
Marie Leonce Murebwayire: College of Science and Technology, School of Engineering, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3900, Rwanda
Erik Nilsson: Faculty of Engineering, Division of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Innocent Nhapi: Centre for Urban Resilience, Water and Climate Change, Plot 16311, Chirorodziva Heights, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
Umaru Garba Wali: College of Science and Technology, School of Engineering, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3900, Rwanda

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-34

Abstract: Background: Kigali, Rwanda’s rapidly growing capital, faces major challenges in household-level Fecal Sludge Management (FSM), with over 89% of households using pit latrines and only 48% accessing unshared sanitation. FSM services are limited, costly, and poorly executed, leading to frequent illegal dumping. Objective: This review analyzes the literature on sanitation in Kigali to identify key gaps, synergies, and recommendations for improvement. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 73 relevant publications were selected from various scientific and governmental sources. Publications were included only if they were published from 2013 to 2024 and had information on sanitation in Kigali. NOS and JBI tools were utilized to assess the quality of included publications. Results: Data were categorized into four themes, (1) access to sanitation, (2) FSM services, (3) public health, and (4) sanitation governance, and analyzed using thematic, narrative, and descriptive methods. Findings reveal a dysfunctional FSM service chain, weak policy enforcement due to overlapping responsibilities, underfunding, and limited private sector participation. These issues contribute to poor sanitation, inadequate hygiene, and prevalence of diarrheal diseases and Tropical Neglected Diseases, especially among young children. Conclusions: The review recommends strengthening governance and clarifying roles, enforcing adaptable regulations, promoting public–private partnerships, and managing the full FSM service chain more effectively. Future research should focus on developing context-specific technologies and financing strategies to support sustainable FSM solutions in Kigali.

Keywords: household sanitation; onsite sanitation; fecal sludge service chain; pit latrines; sanitation policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7588/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7588/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7588-:d:1730442

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-24
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7588-:d:1730442