Enacting Sustainability Through Organizational Routines: A Grounded Theory of Capability–Institution Co-Structuring

Tung-Shan Liao () and Hsin-Pang Lu
Additional contact information
Tung-Shan Liao: College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan
Hsin-Pang Lu: College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-30

Abstract: In institutional environments characterized by ambiguity and contestation, the formation of sustainability capabilities poses significant interpretive and organizational challenges. Existing perspectives often assume clear mandates, strategic intent, and rational agency, yet such assumptions rarely hold in transitional or weakly institutionalized settings. This study adopts a constructivist grounded theory (CGT) approach to examine how sustainability-related routines emerge, stabilize, and contribute to capability formation under conditions of institutional complexity. Drawing from multiple organizational cases across East Asian contexts, this study identifies three interdependent categories of routines, including sensemaking, stabilization, and coordination, that interact recursively to generate sustainability capabilities. These routines function not as linear processes or technical tools, but as dynamic infrastructures of interpretation, consolidation, and alignment. Their recursive interplay enables organizations to translate ambiguous sustainability signals into patterned practices and symbolic legitimacy over time. We consolidate these insights into a mid-range theoretical framework, the Routines-as-Practice Configuration for Sustainability Structuring (RAPCSS). The RAPCSS explains how sustainability is not merely implemented but enacted and continually remade through situated, performative routines. By bridging strategic and practice-based perspectives, this study contributes to sustainability theory by theorizing capabilities as emergent configurations shaped through recursive routine work. This offers a situated, processual, and reflexive account of how sustainability unfolds under conditions of institutional ambiguity.

Keywords: routine-as-practice; sustainability capabilities; constructivist grounded theory; institutional co-structuring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7841/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7841/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7841-:d:1738620

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().