Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessments of Aqueous Phase Reforming for the Energetic Valorization of Winery Wastewaters

Giulia Farnocchia (), Carlos E. Gómez-Camacho, Giuseppe Pipitone (), Roland Hischier, Raffaele Pirone and Samir Bensaid
Additional contact information
Giulia Farnocchia: Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
Carlos E. Gómez-Camacho: Technology and Society Laboratory (TSL), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Empa, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Giuseppe Pipitone: Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
Roland Hischier: Technology and Society Laboratory (TSL), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Empa, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Raffaele Pirone: Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
Samir Bensaid: Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 17, 1-34

Abstract: Globally, winery wastewaters (WWWs) are estimated to account for about 62.5 billion L annually (2021), with COD levels up to 300,000 mg O 2 /L primarily attributed to residual ethanol, posing serious environmental concerns. Conventional treatments are effective in COD removal, but they often miss opportunities for energy recovery and resource valorization. This study investigates the aqueous phase reforming (APR) of ethanol-rich wastewater as an alternative treatment for both COD reduction and energy generation. Two scenarios were assessed: electricity and heat cogeneration (S1) and hydrogen production (S2). Process simulations in Aspen Plus ® V14, based on lab-scale APR data, provided upscaled material and energy flows for techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, and energy sustainability analysis of a 2.5 m 3 /h plant. At 75% ethanol conversion, the minimum selling price (MSP) was USD0.80/kWh with a carbon footprint of 0.08 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh for S1 and USD7.00/kg with 2.57 kg CO 2 -eq/kg H 2 for S2. Interestingly, S1 revealed a non-linear trade-off between APR performance and energy integration, with higher ethanol conversion leading to a higher electricity selling price because of the increased heat reactor duty. In both cases, the main contributors to global warming potential (GWP) were platinum extraction/recovery and residual COD treatment. Both scenarios achieved a positive energy balance, with an energy return on investment (EROI) of 1.57 for S1 and 2.71 for S2. This study demonstrates the potential of APR as a strategy for self-sufficient energy valorization and additional revenue generation in wine-producing regions.

Keywords: aqueous phase reforming; energy recovery; techno-economic assessment; life cycle assessment; hydrogen production; winery wastewater valorization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7856/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7856/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7856-:d:1738807

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().