From Conflict to Coexistence: Integrated Landscape Optimization for Sustainable Tourism in Urban Tourism Areas

Jie Shen, Lei Li () and Liang Peng
Additional contact information
Jie Shen: School of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
Lei Li: Department of Geography, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236000, China
Liang Peng: School of Economy, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 210023, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 18, 1-23

Abstract: Urban Tourism Areas (UTAs) face growing challenges in balancing tourism development with ecological preservation, particularly under the pressures of rapid urbanization and intensified land use. However, systematic approaches to optimizing landscape patterns in urban tourism contexts remain limited. The aim of this study is to develop and apply an integrated framework that combines ecological sensitivity evaluation and landscape eco-ethics to guide sustainable landscape optimization. Using Shihe District in Xinyang City, China—a region marked by diverse natural landscapes and intensive human–environment interactions—as a case study, we applied a multi-indicator ecological sensitivity assessment together with landscape pattern analysis, supported by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and FRAGSTATS software. The results revealed significant spatial heterogeneity in ecological sensitivity across the district. High- and very-high-sensitivity zones accounted for 23.2% of the total area, primarily located in southwestern mountainous regions, while low-sensitivity zones covered 53.8%, concentrated in urban plains and lowlands. The landscape exhibited a Shannon’s Diversity Index (SHDI) of 0.8617 and an Edge Density (ED) of 17.05, reflecting a moderately fragmented spatial structure. Based on these findings, a hierarchical optimization strategy was proposed, delineating three protection zones: primary conservation zones (23.2%), secondary buffer zones (22.9%), and development-prioritized zones (53.8%). This framework promotes ecological integrity, supports balanced tourism development, and accommodates the needs of both tourists and local communities. The model has potential applicability to other global UTAs facing similar conflicts between ecological protection and tourism expansion.

Keywords: Urban Tourism Areas (UTAs); ecological sensitivity; landscape pattern; ecological ethics; Geographic Information Systems (GIS) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8270/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8270/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8270-:d:1749519

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().