EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessment of Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development Countries Based on Agricultural Performance Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Ezgi Güler and Süheyla Yerel Kandemir ()
Additional contact information
Ezgi Güler: Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik 11230, Türkiye
Süheyla Yerel Kandemir: Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik 11230, Türkiye

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 18, 1-25

Abstract: This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of agricultural performance across 38 Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development countries using an integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework that combines Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, Analytical Hierarchy Process-based weighting, and equal-weighting strategies. The analysis reveals that the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje method exhibited greater sensitivity to changes in criterion weights, as confirmed by Spearman’s rank correlation ( P v = 0.507 < P t = 0.938 ), while Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution produced more stable rankings. To confirm the differing outcomes, the Borda count technique is applied, yielding a highly consistent final ranking ( P r a n k = 0.819 ). Remarkably, according to the integrated ranking results, Norway (total Borda score: 73) emerges as the top-performing country in terms of agricultural sustainability, whereas Ireland (total Borda score: 0) is positioned at the bottom. These findings offer a critical reference point for policymakers and stakeholders, highlighting both methodological rigor and practical relevance. By combining subjective and neutral weighting approaches, this study provides a balanced decision-support model and also underscores the potential of hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making structures in generating nuanced and actionable insights in agricultural strategy development.

Keywords: agricultural assessment; Borda count technique; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods; Spearman’s rank correlation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8291/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8291/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8291-:d:1750037

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-18
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8291-:d:1750037