EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Estimating Distance Equivalence for Sustainable Mobility Management: Evidence from China’s “Stay-in-Place” Policy

Youhai Lu, Peixue Liu (), Min Zhuang and Yihan Cao
Additional contact information
Youhai Lu: College of Economics and Mnagement, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Peixue Liu: School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
Min Zhuang: School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
Yihan Cao: Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 18, 1-17

Abstract: Travel policies during crises strongly reshape mobility patterns, raising the challenge of protecting public health while minimizing socio-economic disruption—an essential concern for sustainable development. Most evaluations quantify changes in travel volume, which hampers cross-city comparison and policy monitoring. This study proposes a distance-based sustainability metric—distance equivalence (DE)—that translates policy-induced mobility frictions into interpretable “added distance” within a gravity framework, enabling consistent measurement and monitoring of policy impacts. Using inter-city flows for 358 Chinese cities during the Stay-in-Place for Lunar New Year (SIP) guidance, we map DE, test spatial dependence (Moran’s I; LISA), and apply fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to identify city-level configurations associated with high DE. DE exhibits significant spatial clustering, concentrating east of the Hu line, where dense urban networks amplify advisory checks. Three recurrent configurations—combining case counts, health-care capacity (hospital beds), and average inter-city distance—are linked to high DE. As a sustainability assessment tool, DE supports adaptive management, region-differentiated strategies, and ex-ante risk assessment for governments, public-health authorities, and transport agencies. The framework generalizes to short-term mobility interventions under crisis conditions, advancing the quantification of policy impacts on sustainable mobility and urban resilience.

Keywords: distance equivalence; sustainable mobility; crisis management; policy evaluation; urban resilience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8434/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8434/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8434-:d:1753762

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-26
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8434-:d:1753762