EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Review of Current Substitution Estimates for Buildings with Regard to the Impact on Their GHG Balance and Correlated Effects—A Systematic Comparison

Charlotte Piayda (), Annette Hafner and Sebastian Rüter
Additional contact information
Charlotte Piayda: Resource Efficient Building, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
Annette Hafner: Resource Efficient Building, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
Sebastian Rüter: Impact of Wood Utilization on Environment and Climate, Thünen Institute of Wood Research, 21031 Hamburg, Germany

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-27

Abstract: The construction sector accounts for one-third of Europe’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, offering significant potential for emission reduction. Emission reduction can be achieved by substituting conventional building materials with wood- or bio-based alternatives; the difference in GHG emissions is referred to as the substitution potential (SP). In this study, a literature review was conducted to identify studies in which SPs had been determined. The calculation methods used for these SPs were then analysed in detail. The analysis considered the general conditions, outcomes, and scaling effects, revealing that differing initial conditions lead to inconsistent results. Therefore, transparent allocation of SPs and comparable product life cycle assessments (LCAs) based on functional equivalence are essential. To reliably extrapolate the benefits of wood use to the entire construction sector, scaling effects must be justified by consistent functional equivalence. For policy relevance, it is crucial that SPs are determined using the standardised rules and that the building level, as the actual place of material use, is not overlooked. This is particularly important when scaling up the effects of increased wood use to the landscape level. Only with these measures SPs at the product level can provide reliable results in a broader context. Additionally, the studies reviewed indicate that changes in forest management have not yet been considered.

Keywords: substitution; carbon storage; displacement factor; climate change; wood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8593/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8593/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8593-:d:1757535

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-25
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8593-:d:1757535