Public Space Performance Analysis Using Structured Assessment Framework: Design and Sustainability Metrics in Riyadh’s Parks

Abdulrahman Alymani (), Sara Mandou, Nour Tawil, Layan Alsaad, Noura Almazied and Malak Mohamed
Additional contact information
Abdulrahman Alymani: Department of Architectural Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
Sara Mandou: Department of Architectural Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
Nour Tawil: Department of Architectural Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
Layan Alsaad: Department of Architectural Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
Noura Almazied: Department of Architectural Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
Malak Mohamed: Department of Architectural Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-27

Abstract: Public green spaces are vital to urban life, offering recreational opportunities, enhancing mental and physical well-being, and supporting environmental sustainability. This study presents a structured evaluation of ten public parks in Riyadh, categorized as neighborhood, local, and large parks, and compares their performance to two internationally recognized benchmark parks—Hyde Park and Regent’s Park in London. A partly original evaluation framework was developed to assess the design-related and environmental (nature-based) qualities of these parks. The framework integrates 50 criteria grouped into nine categories, combining quantitative scoring on a five-point scale with qualitative on-site observations. This method enables a comprehensive assessment of design quality, accessibility, and sustainability features. A city-wide map with a color-coded legend illustrates the distribution of the evaluated parks, while field observations and photographic documentation supported the data collection. Findings reveal notable variations in design quality, accessibility, and sustainability across the parks. The results highlight both strengths and gaps compared to international benchmarks, providing valuable insights for improving park design and management. This study contributes to ongoing efforts to enhance park usability and align with Riyadh’s Vision 2030 objectives, offering a practical decision-support tool for planners, managers, and policymakers seeking resilient and inclusive public green spaces.

Keywords: sustainability; park user; urban assessment; green spaces; park evaluation; design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8701/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8701/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8701-:d:1759695

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().