Transitioning from Social Innovation to Public Policy: Can Bangladesh Integrate Urban Rooftop Farming Policies into Governance by Examining Global Practices?

Md Ashikuzzaman (), Mohammad Shahidul Hasan Swapan, Atiq Uz Zaman and Yongze Song
Additional contact information
Md Ashikuzzaman: School of Design and the Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
Mohammad Shahidul Hasan Swapan: School of Design and the Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
Atiq Uz Zaman: School of Design and the Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
Yongze Song: School of Design and the Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-23

Abstract: The concept of green cities promotes efficient utilisation of resources, with urban rooftop farms (URFs) being a key initiative involving a series of actions and decisions between stakeholders and the state. The new public governance discourse (NPGD) emphasises this interplay between the state, the market, and civil society to strengthen collaboration and network-driven social innovation and requires a comprehensive understanding of human/stakeholder behaviour. In this study, we explore the connection between organisational rational choice in URF policy development and social innovation. Through a review of the existing literature on URF policies and a case study of Dhaka, Bangladesh, we investigate the development of a comprehensive policy via participation and collaboration, considering the popularity of URFs and the absence of governing mechanisms in Dhaka. The results suggest that, despite the rising popularity of URFs in Dhaka, existing policies and strategies lack clarity. The review findings suggest that a participatory and co-productive approach is optimal for URF policy formulation. This would require active engagement from community members, local governments, and non-governmental organisations and gaining an enhanced understanding of stakeholder dynamics by testing stakeholder salience and co-production theories for successful URF governance.

Keywords: URF; governance; social innovation; stakeholder salience; ladder of co-production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8768/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8768/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8768-:d:1761551

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().