Cultural Ecosystem Services in Rural Areas: Assessing Demand and Supply for Ecologically Functional Areas (EFA)

Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, Halina Lipińska, Ilona Woźniak-Kostecka, Agnieszka Komor, Agnieszka Kępkowicz, Kamila Adamczyk-Mucha (), Ewelina Krukow and Agnieszka Duniewicz
Additional contact information
Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek: Department of Grassland Science and Landscaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Halina Lipińska: Department of Grassland Science and Landscaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Ilona Woźniak-Kostecka: Department of Grassland Science and Landscaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Agnieszka Komor: Department of Management and Marketing, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Agnieszka Kępkowicz: Department of Grassland Science and Landscaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Kamila Adamczyk-Mucha: Department of Grassland Science and Landscaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Ewelina Krukow: Department of Grassland Science and Landscaping, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Agnieszka Duniewicz: Department of Architectural Design and History of Architecture, Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Białystok, Poland

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-25

Abstract: Cultural ecosystem services (CES) play a key role in the sustainable development of rural areas—yet they remain poorly quantified in planning practice. This study examines the relationship between the supply and demand of CES provided by various types of Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs) in a rural landscape, using the municipality of Sosnowica (eastern Poland) as a case study. Landscapes such as forests, agricultural land, wetlands, and inland waters were evaluated using a set of biophysical and socio-economic indicators that reflect both their potential (supply) and actual use (demand) in terms of services such as recreation, landscape aesthetics, and cultural heritage. The findings reveal significant spatial disparities between CES supply and demand: forests and inland waters exhibit the highest supply potential, while agricultural land shows untapped opportunities in tourism and recreation. Wetlands, in particular, face notable service deficits—highlighting the need for targeted infrastructure and management interventions. Statistical analyses (Pearson correlation, Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey HSD test) confirmed that the key factors shaping CES are accessibility and environmental attractiveness. The results indicate that CES mapping is a valuable tool for supporting sustainable rural planning, reinforcing local identity, counteracting depopulation, and stimulating socio-economic development.

Keywords: cultural ecosystem services; demand; supply; ecologically functional areas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8822/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8822/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8822-:d:1763275

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().