Expert Credibility Factors and Their Impact on Digital Innovation and Sustainability Adoption in China’s Social Media Ecosystem

Shasha Li and Chao Gao ()
Additional contact information
Shasha Li: School of Humanities, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
Chao Gao: School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-34

Abstract: The successful implementation of digital transformation initiatives depends critically on public trust in experts guiding these processes. In today’s digital media environment, expert trust faces significant challenges, potentially hindering sustainable innovation adoption. This study investigates how expert credibility dimensions and information characteristics shape trust in digital transformation experts among Chinese social media users. We employed a mixed-methods approach combining a survey of 850 Chinese social media users, a quasi-experiment testing a digital expert verification feature, and secondary data analysis. The study measured multiple dimensions of expert trust while examining relationships with expert cognition factors and media usage variables through regression, mediation, and structural equation modeling. Expert trust in digital transformation exists at moderate levels ( M = 6.82/10), with higher trust in digital innovation research ( M = 7.12) than specific sustainability recommendations ( M = 6.59). Expert authenticity emerged as the strongest predictor of trust ( β = 0.27), followed by professional competence ( β = 0.21). A “digital exposure paradox” emerged whereby higher volumes of expert information negatively predicted trust ( β = −0.18), while information quality positively predicted trust ( β = 0.25). The digital verification feature causally enhanced trust (DID = 0.57), with institutional sources strengthening trust while user-generated content diminished it. The findings reveal that digital transformation expert trust involves multi-dimensional evaluations beyond traditional credibility assessments. The “digital exposure paradox” suggests that prioritizing information quality over quantity, demonstrating expert authenticity, and implementing verification mechanisms can enhance trust and accelerate sustainable digital transformation adoption.

Keywords: digital transformation; expert trust; digital sustainability; information quality; social media; digital innovation adoption; expert credibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9017/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9017/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9017-:d:1769190

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().