EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Role of Institutional and Innovation Ecosystem in Moderating the Impact of Green Practices on Export Performance: Evidence from European Countries

Chatchai Khiewngamdee () and Somsak Chanaim
Additional contact information
Chatchai Khiewngamdee: Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chaing Mai 50202, Thailand
Somsak Chanaim: International College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University, Chaing Mai 50202, Thailand

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-29

Abstract: As global merchandise exports reached $22 trillion in 2023 and environmental standards have become increasingly stringent, understanding how green practices influence export competitiveness has become critically important. Although existing research documents positive associations between environmental practices and trade outcomes, the conditions that enhance or constrain these relationships remain underexplored, particularly at the macro level across different export performance segments. Using panel data from 30 European countries for the period 2012–2022, this study examines how institutional and innovation ecosystem factors moderate the relationship between green practices and export performance. Employing panel quantile regression alongside conventional panel methods, we investigate whether regulatory quality, research and development expenditure, and financial market development influence the export benefits derived from ISO14001 certification and environmental patents. Our baseline findings reveal that both environmental management systems and green innovations show positive associations with exports, with ISO14001 certification demonstrating stronger effects in countries with lower export volumes. Notably, regulatory quality and financial market development significantly amplify the export benefits of environmental management systems. However, robustness checks employing instrumental variable estimation and System GMM to address potential endogeneity reveal that these direct effects weaken substantially when reverse causality is explicitly addressed, though point estimates remain consistently positive. These results suggest that while positive associations between environmental practices and export performance appear robust across multiple specifications, establishing definitive causal effects requires cautious interpretation and future quasi-experimental research. The findings highlight the importance of coordinated policy approaches integrating environmental, financial market, and regulatory dimensions, while underscoring that institutional moderators may provide more robust insights than direct effect estimates for understanding how environmental practices enhance competitiveness in international markets.

Keywords: environmental certification; green innovation; regulatory quality; financial market development; panel quantile regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9146/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9146/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9146-:d:1772234

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-16
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9146-:d:1772234