Integrated Technical–Economic–Environmental Evaluation of Available Technologies for Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment Used in Lead–Zinc Smelting in the Yellow River Basin

Yafeng Wu, Hao Fang () and Yuhua Zhou ()
Additional contact information
Yafeng Wu: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Hao Fang: Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China
Yuhua Zhou: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-15

Abstract: Evaluating the efficacy of available technology for pollutant treatment is critical for formulating environmental management policies and standards. To address the lack of systematic quantitative methods for evaluating available technology, we propose a method based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS model which integrates technology, economic efficiency, environmental benefits, and operational feasibility. We applied this approach to evaluate six heavy metal wastewater treatment technologies used in the lead–zinc smelting industry in the Yellow River Basin of China. A total of 4 primary and 16 secondary evaluation indicators were identified. The data were mainly composed of supervised monitoring data collected by local environmental protection authorities and self-monitoring operation data collected from factories; moreover, 10 relevant experts were invited to assess the scoring indicators. The results showed that technical performance had the greatest contribution to the overall efficacy of the treatment technology (62.31% weight), followed by environmental benefits (14.24% weight), economic costs (12.08% weight), and operational feasibility (11.36% weight). The final scores and rankings of the six technologies evaluated showed that a sulfurization precipitation with two-stage lime neutralization and sedimentation technology received the highest score due to its balanced technical performance, economic cost, environmental benefits, and operational feasibility. Conversely, lime neutralization with flocculation precipitation technology ranked lowest due to its non-compliance with the emission limits in China, despite its low economic cost and carbon emission intensity. This study provides a quantitative methodological framework for evaluating available technology, emphasizing the balance of the technical, economic, and environmental benefits of the pollutant treatment technologies chosen and the relevant policies made.

Keywords: available technology; heavy metal; wastewater treatment; lead–zinc smelting industry; Yellow River Basin; quantitative evaluation; water; environment; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9188/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9188/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9188-:d:1772945

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().