Are Accreditation Bodies Holding Back Sustainability in Civil Engineering Education in Australia? An Analysis of Syllabi

Mackenzie Warren, Blake Rosenberg, Scott Rayburg and John Rodwell ()
Additional contact information
Mackenzie Warren: School of Engineering, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
Blake Rosenberg: School of Engineering, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
Scott Rayburg: School of Engineering, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
John Rodwell: School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship, Hawthorn Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-15

Abstract: Civil engineers have a substantial role to play in addressing the sustainability challenges facing the world. Accreditation bodies have recognized the need for more sustainability content in engineering education. Yet the inclusion of sustainability content in university engineering curricula has been slow and incomplete. To assess the progress of these changes, this study examines the extent to which sustainability is present in Australian undergraduate civil engineering courses and how it is shaped by accreditation and institutional pressures. Content coding of syllabi and course outcomes was used to assess the extent to which sustainability topics were present in compulsory units in the 11 universities with the largest engineering enrolments in Australia. The results indicate that there were negligible amounts of explicit sustainability content across most of the universities assessed, suggesting that they were not meeting the urgent need for more sustainability in engineering education. The consistency across the universities reveals strong isomorphism, suggesting possible solutions for increasing the presence of sustainability in engineering education in Australia. The most direct change mechanism would be for the accrediting body, Engineers Australia, to use their legitimation power. If Engineers Australia’s standards required a notable presence of sustainability competences, the universities would be very likely to comply.

Keywords: curriculum; content coding; institutional theory; isomorphism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9247/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9247/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9247-:d:1774158

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().