Comparative Environmental Insights into Additive Manufacturing in Sand Casting and Investment Casting: Pathways to Net-Zero Manufacturing

Alok Yadav, Rajiv Kumar Garg, Anish Sachdeva, Karishma M. Qureshi, Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi () and Muhammad Musa Al-Qahtani
Additional contact information
Alok Yadav: Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144008, India
Rajiv Kumar Garg: Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144008, India
Anish Sachdeva: Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144008, India
Karishma M. Qureshi: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, Waghodia 391760, India
Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi: Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
Muhammad Musa Al-Qahtani: Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 21, 1-18

Abstract: As manufacturing industries pursue net-zero emission (NZE) goals, hybrid manufacturing processes that integrate additive manufacturing (AM) with traditional casting techniques are gaining traction for their sustainability potential across the globe. Therefore, this work presents a “gate-to-gate” life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing AM-assisted sand casting (AM-SC) and AM-assisted investment casting (AM-IC), for Al-Si5-Cu3 alloy as a case material, under various energy scenarios including a conventional grid mix and renewable sources (wind, solar, hydro, and biomass). This study compares multiple environmental impact categories based on the CML 2001 methodology. The outcomes show that AM-SC consistently outperforms AM-IC in most impact categories. Under the grid mix scenario, AM-SC achieves 31.57% lower GWP, 19.28% lower AP, and 21.15% lower EP compared to AM-IC. AM-SC exhibits a 90.5% reduction in “Terrestrial Ecotoxicity Potential” and 75.73% in “Marine Ecotoxicity Potential”. Wind energy delivers the most significant emission reduction across both processes, reducing GWP by up to 98.3%, while AM-IC performs slightly better in HTP. These outcomes of the study offer site-specific empirical insights that support strategic decision-making for process selection and energy optimisation in casting. By quantifying environmental trade-offs aligned with India’s current energy mix and future renewable targets, the study provides a practical benchmark for tracking incremental gains toward the NZE goal. This work followed international standards (ISO 14040 and 14044), and the data were validated with both foundry records and field measurements; this study ensures reliable methods. The findings provide practical applications for making sustainable choices in the manufacturing process and show that the AM-assisted conventional manufacturing process is a promising route toward net-zero goals.

Keywords: additive manufacturing; sand casting; investment casting; life cycle assessment; environmental impact assessment; net-zero manufacturing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9709/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9709/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9709-:d:1784164

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().