Manure Application and Energy Potential in Southeastern China

Yufeng Wang, Hua Deng and Chih-Chun Kung ()
Additional contact information
Yufeng Wang: School of Economics, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
Hua Deng: School of Economics, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
Chih-Chun Kung: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 21, 1-29

Abstract: China has promoted renewable energy development to adjust its energy structure and improve energy security. The decision-makers consider manure-to-energy a feasible possibility because manure contains a substantial amount of organic materials that are potentially useful for generating power, and its use would also alleviate environmental pressures. Southern China, including Anhui, Fujian, Guangdong, and Zhejiang provinces, has launched policies to support manure facilities and energy sales. This study employs a lifecycle analysis and techno-economic assessment to evaluate whether manure application could be an economically feasible alternative. The results indicate that the thermophilic system has greater energy potential, and the mesophilic mode can yield greater agronomic benefits with digestate application. Hog manure can generate biopower ranging from 5599 to 5683 GWh, and it is 653 to 1887 GWh for cattle, 2481 to 2963 GWh for poultry manure, and 1109 to 1536 GWh for sheep manure. The aggregate emission offset could also be substantial. If all manures are properly utilized, the net emission offset could be up to 12.07 million metric tons of CO 2 equivalent, with an aggregate energy revenue of approximately USD 1086 million annually. In addition to the aggregate result, this study also indicates that manure application would yield a profit ranging from USD 8.36 to USD 34.3, and the benefit from biofertilizer would be roughly between USD 27.72 and USD 43.49. Nevertheless, regional characteristics, such as temperature, precipitation, and soil quality, generally influence agricultural systems, and the benefits associated with agrarian feedback would involve a higher uncertainty. On the contrary, energy sales could be considered a more reliable and stable source of income, even without government subsidies.

Keywords: climate change; emission offset; lifecycle analysis; manure application; techno-economic assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9875/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9875/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9875-:d:1788304

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().