Understanding Local Perceptions on Drivers of Deforestation and Policy Instruments for Forest Conservation: A Comparative Analysis of Porto Velho and Manaus

Danielle Nogueira Lopes, Takuya Hiroshima () and Satoshi Tsuyuki
Additional contact information
Danielle Nogueira Lopes: Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
Takuya Hiroshima: Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
Satoshi Tsuyuki: Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 22, 1-29

Abstract: Deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon remain critical threats to ecosystem integrity and local livelihoods. Existing approaches often overlook the nuanced perspectives of different regional actors, limiting our understanding of deforestation drivers and conservation policy effectiveness. This study compared perceptions of deforestation drivers and policy instruments between two major development hubs, Porto Velho and Manaus, using Likert-scale questionnaires administered to 49 villagers and 27 experts. Villagers across both areas identified Natural Disasters (RII = 0.79) and Forest Fires (RII = 0.63) as the most influential drivers, with these ranking particularly high in Porto Velho. Contrastingly, Cattle Ranching Expansion (RII = 0.89) and Political Intervention (RII = 0.86) were prominent in Porto Velho, while Forest Fires (RII = 0.84) and Illegal Logging (RII = 0.73) dominated in Manaus, highlighting distinct governance and economic priorities. Experts and locals both highlighted strong connections between agricultural expansion, land tenure insecurity, and policy deficiency. Conservation units (RII = 0.95) were considered the most important policy instrument according to experts in both areas and governance levels. These results highlight the need for context-specific, participatory solutions tailored to regional realities in Amazonian forest management.

Keywords: forest conservation; deforestation; local perceptions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10094/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/22/10094/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:22:p:10094-:d:1792590

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().