Sustainability Evaluation: Assessing Supply Chain Impact on Company Performance
Antonio Savi (),
Luan Santos and
Marcelo Savi
Additional contact information
Antonio Savi: Production Engineering Program (PEP/COPPE/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21S41972, Brazil
Luan Santos: Production Engineering Program (PEP/COPPE/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21S41972, Brazil
Marcelo Savi: Mechanical Engineering Program (PEM/COPPE/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941914, Brazil
Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 3, 1-23
Abstract:
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects have a growing relevance in the corporate world where the objective for sustainability becomes an essential point. The supply chain (SC) is a buyer’s responsibility and accounts for a large part of their ESG footprint. Since ESG performance extends to SC, poor ESG practices in the SC can negatively affect the sustainability of the Anchor Company (AC). Therefore, AC, the buyer, needs to go through a complex, expensive, and time-consuming process to assess their SC. The objective of this work is to develop an ESG assessment model for companies to receive a quantitative score of their footprint by considering both their operations and the SC. The model is verified by considering different scenarios that are designed by testing two different cases with different interactions between two ACs and two SCs with different ESG maturity levels. Results show that the SC has a significant impact on the final ESG score of the AC, highlighting the need for considering the SC to evolve in ESG aspects. In all tested cases, the SC accounted for more than 50% of the final consolidated ESG score. Despite differing ESG maturity levels, two ACs received the same consolidated score due to the influence of their SC scores. Results emphasize that achieving a strong consolidated ESG score is important, and advanced corporate sustainability is not possible without integrating the SC into the strategy. The novel methodology proposed contributes to sustainability, expanding the scope of ESG assessments to include SC and developing a standardized and adaptable model with practical applications.
Keywords: ESG; sustainability; supply chain; corporate management; quantitative analysis; ESG ratings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1158/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1158/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1158-:d:1581096
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().