Sustainable Utilization of Waste Glass Powder and Brick Dust as Cement Replacements: Effects on Mortar Performance and Environmental Benefits

Balikis Omotola Rabiu and Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah ()
Additional contact information
Balikis Omotola Rabiu: Department of Civil Engineering, Cyprus International University, Nicosia 99258, North Cyprus, Turkey
Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah: Department of Civil Engineering, Cyprus International University, Nicosia 99258, North Cyprus, Turkey

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 3, 1-31

Abstract: With respect to sustainability, the material must maintain the quality and properties of concrete and be safe for human health, the environment, and long-time use. In recent times, the emission of CO 2 from cement production processes has lessened with the passage of time due to its effect on the environment. In order to lessen the emissions and reduce environmental waste, available by-products with pozzolanic properties are applied. With respect to Portland limestone cement (CEMI II-BL), i.e., cement with lower carbon dioxide emissions and better workability than CEM I, the two main materials applied in the study as substitutes are brick dust (BD) and waste glass powder (WGP) bottles. Waste glass powder and brick dust, in quantities varying from 5% to 10%, 15%, and 20%, with a water/cement ratio of 0.35 and a 1.5% superplasticizer, were utilized to observe the effectiveness of BD and WGP on the flowability, compressive strength, flexural strength, water absorption, density, drying shrinkage, and fire resistance of the specimen mortar. The output shows that a WGP of 20% increased flowability compared to the control, whereas the inclusion of brick dust decreased it. At the age of 28, glass powder of 20% increased the compressive strength, while 20% brick dust exhibited a reduction; 15% WGP with 5% BD displayed the lowest absorption of water; and the density of all the samples proved to be much lower than the traditional mix, with 20% BD being the lowest (hereby labeled as light mortar). The 10% WGP with 10% BD displayed better resistance to fire, and the drying shrinkage of the sample was relatively low after several days of air curing. The impact on the environment and cost were considered without accounting for the transportation and manufacturing energy. As to the outcome of this experiment, we concluded that the use of both brick dust and glass powder with CEM II for producing mortar has proven very promising in a variety of different respects, including the mechanical and fresh features of mortar, with the combination of 5% WGP and 15% BD exhibiting the most potential in all of the acquired parameters.

Keywords: sustainability; waste glass powder; brick dust; solid waste; recycling materials (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1298/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1298/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1298-:d:1584346

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().