Impact of Conservation Agriculture on Soil Quality and Cotton–Maize System Yield in Semi-Arid India

Knight Nthebere (), RamPrakash Tata, Padmaja Bhimireddy, Latha P. Chandran, Jayasree Gudapati, Meena Admala, Nishant K. Sinha, Thumma B. Srikanth and Kavuru Prasad
Additional contact information
Knight Nthebere: Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad 500030, India
RamPrakash Tata: Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad 500030, India
Padmaja Bhimireddy: Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad 500030, India
Latha P. Chandran: Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India
Jayasree Gudapati: Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad 500030, India
Meena Admala: Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad 500030, India
Nishant K. Sinha: Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Institute of Soil Science (ICAR-IISS), Indian Institute of Soil Science, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal 462038, India
Thumma B. Srikanth: Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad 500030, India
Kavuru Prasad: Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR), Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad 500030, India

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 3, 1-23

Abstract: Intensive agriculture is the chief cause of soil degradation, particularly in regions with low soil organic carbon status, such as semi-arid southern India. In the quest to attain sustainable yield and improved soil quality, conservation agriculture (CA) is being advocated and adopted globally, including in India. In this experiment, CA was implemented to investigate the synergistic impacts of tillage and weed management on soil quality index and system yield and to identify a remunerative treatment combination that can sustain system yield and enhance soil quality. Contrasting tillage practices (main plots) included the T 1 : conventional tillage with cotton–conventional tillage with maize–fallow, i.e., no Sesbania rostrata (Farmers’ practice), T 2 : conventional tillage with cotton–zero tillage with maize–zero tillage with Sesbania rostrata and T 3 : zero tillage with cotton + Sesbania rostrata residues–zero tillage with maize + cotton residues–zero tillage with Sesbania rostrata + maize stubbles. Weed management tactics (sub-plots) were W 1 : chemical weed control, W 2 : herbicide rotation, W 3 : integrated weed management and W 4 : single hand-weeded control in a split-plot design with cotton–maize– Sesbania cropping system over 3 years, in a split-plot design. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the soil quality index (SQI)-CAL Version 1.0 software tool to extract minimum datasets from measured soil properties. A total of 40 soil variables were analyzed at 60 DAS and after the maize harvest, then subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) and subjected to PCA in soil quality index (SQI)-CAL software as to choose variables, minimum dataset and obtain soil quality index. The following soil properties, soil organic carbon (SOC), silt fraction, available soil zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), potassium (K), nitrogen (N), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), soil carbon to nitrogen (C:N) and cation exchange capacity (CEC), were selected as indicators based on correlations, calculated PCA and adept opinions on texture and lime concretions of experimental soil. The soil quality index improved by 23.34% in the T 3 W 4 compared to T 1 W 1 . The system yield was 51.79% higher with the adoption of T 3 W 3 compared to T 3 W 4 combinations. Therefore, considering both system yield and soil quality index, T 3 and W 3 were remunerative and the best treatment combination among all others to sustain both soil and crop productivity in this region.

Keywords: soil quality; crop productivity; conservation agriculture; sustainability; cropping system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/978/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/978/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:978-:d:1576800

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().