Organic Camelina Meal as a Replacement for Soybean Meal in Swine Finishing Diets: A Life Cycle Analysis Perspective

Joel Tallaksen (), Lee Johnston, Russ Gesch, Frank Forcella and Yuzhi Li
Additional contact information
Joel Tallaksen: West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA
Lee Johnston: West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA
Russ Gesch: USDA-ARS North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, Morris, MN 56267, USA
Frank Forcella: USDA-ARS North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, Morris, MN 56267, USA
Yuzhi Li: West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 4, 1-20

Abstract: The production of organic meat and dairy products relies on limited organic protein meal supplies. Camelina ( Camelina sativa L.) may sustainably increase organic protein meal supplies. Using grain production trial data, research literature, and camelina feeding trial results, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil energy impacts were modeled for inclusion of 10% camelina meal in swine finishing diets using life cycle analysis (LCA). Two key grain production scenarios were examined: field trial relay (FTR) camelina and a higher yielding as expected relay (AER) camelina, with a baseline monocrop soybean (MCS). At the grain production stage, the FTR, AER, and MCS scenarios emitted 0.65, 0.43, and 0.13 kg of CO 2 eq./kg DM grain harvested, respectively. At the meal production stage, 0.61, 0.40, and 0.15 kg of CO 2 eq. were emitted per kg of protein meal from the FTR, AER, and MCS scenarios, respectively. GHG emissions from the finishing phase of pork production were 1.43, 1.38, and 1.31 kg CO 2 eq./kg live weight pigs produced for the FTR, AER, and MCS scenarios, respectively. Findings were similar for fossil energy use. The higher environmental burdens from camelina grain production due to reduced yields of both camelina and soybean resulted in negative environmental performance in camelina-amended diets.

Keywords: camelina sativa; swine production; life cycle assessment; livestock feed; soybean meal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1443/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1443/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1443-:d:1587791

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().