EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quantitative Assessment of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Impacts on China–EU Trade and Provincial-Level Vulnerabilities

Lijun Ren, Jingru Wang, Luoyi Zhang, Xiaoxiao Hu (), Yan Ning, Jianhui Cong, Yongling Li, Weiqiang Zhang, Tian Xu and Xiaoning Shi
Additional contact information
Lijun Ren: School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China
Jingru Wang: School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China
Luoyi Zhang: School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Xiaoxiao Hu: School of Economics and Management, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
Yan Ning: Branch of Climate Change Response, Department of Ecology and Environment of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030024, China
Jianhui Cong: School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China
Yongling Li: Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Weiqiang Zhang: School of Business and Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Tian Xu: School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Xiaoning Shi: School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong 999077, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: The implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) carries profound implications for China’s export trade with the EU. However, a comprehensive analysis of CBAM’s impact on provincial export trade, particularly one grounded in industrial linkages and incorporating diverse policy scenarios, remains limited. To address this gap, this study develops a mechanistic framework based on industrial linkage theory and dynamically integrates key factors such as the scope of industries covered by CBAM, carbon emission accounting boundaries, and carbon pricing into a multi-scenario quantitative model. Leveraging a refined multi-region input–output (MRIO) model, we quantitatively assess the effects of CBAM on China’s provincial exports to the EU under various scenarios. The findings show that CBAM significantly raises export costs, leading to a pronounced decline in the competitiveness of five highly vulnerable industries. As CBAM expands to include sectors covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the total levies on affected industries increase considerably, ranging from USD 0.07 billion to USD 2.25 billion depending on the scenario. Conversely, seven provincial industries, such as the chemical industry in Shanxi, experience only limited impacts due to their low direct carbon intensity and minimal overall increases in carbon tariffs. Then, the study underscores the pivotal role of China’s domestic carbon pricing mechanism in mitigating the effects of CBAM. Higher domestic carbon prices enhance China’s capacity to respond effectively, thereby reducing the overall impact of the mechanism. By adopting an inter-industry linkage perspective, this study provides new insights into assessing the multidimensional impacts of CBAM on China’s exports to the EU across provinces under different policy design scenarios, providing lessons for different categories of provinces on how to cope with CBAM.

Keywords: Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism; provincial-level vulnerabilities; China–EU trade; quantitative assessment; multi-regional inputs and outputs model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1699/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1699/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1699-:d:1594073

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1699-:d:1594073