 Decision Support for Infrastructure Management of Public InstitutionsNikša Jajac (niksa.jajac@gradst.hr)
Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 5, 1-29 Abstract: The management of public institutions is focused not only on providing and improving public services but also on managing the physical infrastructure that these institutions use—buildings for provision of such services. The focus of this paper is on decision support to the management of individual buildings and the set of such buildings (portfolio) during the planning phase. More precisely, it is directed towards support towards both the decision-maker (DM) and decision-making process (DMP) when planning construction activities/projects such as maintenance, renovation, reconstruction, extension, construction, design/preparation of project-technical documentation, etc. The aforementioned DMP includes the processing of a large amount of diverse data (technical, economic, social, etc.) expressed differently—numerically or descriptively, as well as in different units of measurement, simultaneously taking into account the different wishes and attitudes of stakeholders (consequently meeting their often conflicting goals and criteria). The above indicates that it is a complex and ill-defined multi-criteria problem faced by the DM/planner. On top of that, and knowing that the DM usually does not have all the necessary knowledge and skills, this paper proposes how to overcome these issues by supporting the DM within the DMP during such a planning process. The proposed concept promotes an integral (considering relevant aspects of this management problem) and inclusive (taking into account the views of relevant stakeholders) approach to managing complex construction projects and their portfolios. It is methodologically based on the logic of decision support systems and multi-criteria analysis. The multi-criteria methods used include the Preference Ranking Organization METhod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) for the evaluation and comparison of alternatives in an integral manner, as well as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining the weights of criteria and achieving an inclusive and consistent approach to relevant stakeholders (based on the goal tree approach). The concept was tested on the planning of infrastructure management at a university in the Republic of Croatia, and it was proven to be useful because it provided the DM with a basis for decision making. The usefulness of the concept was confirmed by the concordance of the plan obtained using the concept and the activities/projects actually realized. Keywords: project management; construction; infrastructure management; multi-criteria methods AHP; PROMETHEE; goal tree (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2096-:d:1602231 Access Statistics for this article Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu More articles in Sustainability from MDPI |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to econpapers@oru.se.
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.