Green Innovation and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Empirical Evidence from China

Jinda Wen () and Haonan Chen ()
Additional contact information
Jinda Wen: School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100142, China
Haonan Chen: School of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 5, 1-25

Abstract: An in-depth understanding of the impact of green innovation on the urban–rural income gap is essential for developing countries seeking to address urban–rural imbalances and promote sustainable economic development. This study focuses on China, utilizing provincial panel data from 2007 to 2022, and employs the two-way fixed effects model, the mediating effects model, and the moderating effects model. The study’s key findings are: (1) Green innovation positively reduces the urban–rural income gap. Specifically, the regression results indicate that a one-unit increase in green innovation corresponds to a 0.017-unit reduction in the urban–rural income gap. (2) The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect of green innovation on the urban–rural income gap is more pronounced in regions with higher levels of economic development, in non-food-producing areas, and when green utility patents are adopted. Additionally, green innovation narrows the urban–rural income gap predominantly in high-skill regions. (3) Examining the influencing mechanism confirms that green innovation reduces the urban–rural income gap by promoting population urbanization, eco-urbanization, labor force restructuring, and mitigating wage income inequality. (4) The moderating effects analysis indicates that environmental pollution exacerbates the impact of green innovation on the urban–rural income gap; specifically, higher levels of environmental pollution amplify the effect of green innovation in reducing the gap. These findings offer valuable insights for addressing urban–rural income inequality and fostering sustainable socio-economic development in developing countries.

Keywords: green innovation; urban–rural income gap; environmental pollution; mediating effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2106/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2106/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2106-:d:1602470

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().