Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Impact Analysis and Optimization of Coal–Biomass Combustion Combined Cycle CHP Systems

Dasith Wijesekara, Prasad Amarasinghe, Ashan Induranga, Vimukthi Vithanage and Kaveenga Rasika Koswattage ()
Additional contact information
Dasith Wijesekara: Faculty of Technology, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya 70140, Sri Lanka
Prasad Amarasinghe: Faculty of Technology, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya 70140, Sri Lanka
Ashan Induranga: Faculty of Technology, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya 70140, Sri Lanka
Vimukthi Vithanage: Faculty of Technology, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya 70140, Sri Lanka
Kaveenga Rasika Koswattage: Faculty of Technology, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya 70140, Sri Lanka

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-21

Abstract: Combined Cycle Combined Heat and Power (CCCHP) systems enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions by simultaneously generating electricity and heat. This study presents the energy and exergy performance, environmental impact, and efficiency optimization of CCCHP combustion systems using Ebsilon Professional 16 software simulation. Three fuel combustion CCCHP systems of coal, biomass, and coal–biomass cofiring were simulated for 150 MW of total power output with 125 MW of electrical power and 25 MW of a heating energy system. The sensitivity analysis was performed for 16 different systems with the fuel moisture content varying from 10% to 40% ( w / w ) to identify the energy and environmental effect on simulated CCCHP systems. The simulation results indicate that increasing biomass moisture content enhanced flue gas energy and improved the Rankine cycle performance. The energy efficiency of biomass and coal–biomass combustion CCCHP systems increased from 56.90% to 67.22% and 56.94% to 62.37, with the moisture content rising from 10% to 30% ( w / w ) and 10% ( w / w ) to 25.56% ( w / w ), respectively, but declined beyond these. Moreover, the exergy efficiency showed a similar pattern peaking at 50.06% in biomass samples and 50.10% in the cofiring sample. Furthermore, the environmental impact, CO 2 and SO 2 emission concentrations reduced from 22.42% ( w / w ) to 20.77 ( w / w ) and 0.66% to 0.61%, respectively, with an increase in fuel moisture content from 10% to 25.56% in a biomass cofired combustion CCCHP system.

Keywords: combined cycle heat and power; combustion; energy; exergy; efficiency; moisture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2363/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2363/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2363-:d:1607813

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().