Comprehensive Assessment and Obstacle Analysis on Low-Carbon Development Quality of 30 Provincial Regions in China
Haoran Zhao (),
Zhen Yang,
Shunan Wu,
Zhuowen Zhang,
Chuan Li,
Chunhua Jin and
Sen Guo ()
Additional contact information
Haoran Zhao: Business School, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100085, China
Zhen Yang: Business School, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100085, China
Shunan Wu: China Energy Capital Holdings Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, China
Zhuowen Zhang: Business School, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100085, China
Chuan Li: Business School, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100085, China
Chunhua Jin: Business School, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100085, China
Sen Guo: School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-27
Abstract:
Low-carbon development (LCD) in China has become the critical measure to achieve sustainable development and handle climate change. This investigation evaluates 30 provincial regions’ LCD quality from dimensions of low-carbon (LC) economy, resources utilization, LC environment, and LC society. According to the integrated weights combined subjective weights identified through the best–worst method (BWM) and objective weights attained through the anti-entropy weight (AEW) method, the top five sub-criteria in 2021 were coal consumption relative to total primary energy consumption, industrial sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emission, carbon dioxide emissions intensity, industrial dust emission, and forest coverage rate. According to the comprehensive evaluation results obtained through the MARCOS model, Beijing’s comprehensive score is far ahead, and its scores in resource utilization, LC environment, and LC economy are also in a leading position. Moreover, the level of LCD quality shows a gradually reduced pattern from east to west. The obstacle analysis demonstrates that the obstacle factors with high frequency of occurrence include real GDP, energy intensity, coal consumption relative to total primary energy consuming, carbon dioxide emissions intensity, industrial dust emission, industrial SO 2 emission, forest coverage rate, and the number of private vehicles. Suggestions are proposed based on the results, including increase infrastructure construction, optimize energy structure and develop renewable energy, protect the ecological environment with intensify efforts, and accelerate industrial transformation and upgrading to optimize industrial structure.
Keywords: low-carbon development quality; provincial regions in China; multi-criteria decision-making framework; obstacle analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2425/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2425/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2425-:d:1609169
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().